These are
tough times for pubs. Particularly for the out-of-town local (OTL) that can’t boast
a large car park for diners or lots of passing trade. In recent times we’ve
seen a steady erosion of the street corner and mod-terrace type of pub that
were once as common as an MP’s fiddled expenses.
Local authorities
have heeded the smoke signals coming from the government and, ever since they
seized control of licensing, seem to have made the suburban pub their public enemy
number one. Whilst continuing to license and tolerate any number of premises in
the town centre; the slightest infringement by an OTL is seized upon eagerly.
Sadly the
local authority is now often acting at the behest of a disgruntled neighbour.
Where once the attraction of moving next door to a pub was seen as moving
closer to an amenity, this is no longer the case. The pub’s proximity is seen
as a nuisance, an annoyance that is best curtailed. If you don’t use it why
should anyone else, seems to be the attitude.
Thus in
recent years we have seen pubs closed because taxi doors are being “slammed”
(in permitted hours) or people are gathering outside for a smoke. I know, I know,
if only we hadn’t forced them outside in the first place.
Sometimes it
is an ex-regular who has had fallen out with his former haunt. Hence the
closure of a mid-terrace pub that dared to have its jukebox playing at 7pm on a
Saturday in June. Unacceptable as next door happened to have its windows open
and that’s the last thing you expect from a pub in summer. Especially when you are no longer
welcome in said pub.
So it was
with some resignation that I read a recent letter in the local press concerning
the Help Me Thro’. This is a pleasant, terraced Thwaites pub that, as far as I
know, tries to cater for its customers; who mainly live nearby.
However,
according to ‘Disgruntled Grandparent’ it’s frequented by “inhabitants of other
areas” and is characterised by loud music etc. Even worse, the local councillor
had the audacity to defend the place. What about serving his disgruntled constituents?
All very sadly predictable.
But this
week’s edition contains not one, but two letters carrying the fight to the pub’s
misanthropic neighbour. Not hiding behind anonymity (pointless as the identity
of the miserable sod is well known) they seek to put the record straight.
The
councillor was acting in his constituents interests: the pub is a local
business and it is frequented by responsible local folk who enjoy the odd
night out. Music is restricted to once a month or so and is of the solo kind,
not an ACDC jamboree. And if you can’t stand the heat, don’t move next door to
a pub. How do you like those apples, my hostelry-hating frined?
In the words
of the late Clive Dunn: “They don’t like it up ‘em.”
6 comments:
When people object to the opening of takeaways in their locality, they often claim that they will be frequented by "people from other areas".
It's probably the same for brothels
What is the problem with people from other areas?
Nev
Isn't it obvious? They're from other areas!
How would you like to live next door to people from other areas?
Well if they lived next door to me, then they wouldn't be from another area any longer, would they?
Post a Comment