Saturday, 6 February 2010
Who's Sorry Now?
Some thought has evidently gone into the charges, as potentially there were several candidates. However, some people didn’t cooperate with the investigation and some other offences would have been harder to prove. Of course, we do not know all the facts behind two of the charges. He may well just have a bad memory and that’s why he forgot he owned the properties he was supposed to be renting.
Sadly for him, there can be few households in Bury who are not familiar with all the facts of the third offence. There isn’t even the remotest plausible defence for it and falsely invoking the name of local legend Joe Stalin was truly shameful. I expect his brief to get him to hold his hands up for that one.
Such was his former standing, though, that deep disappointment was the prevalent mood in the pub tonight. One question people were asking was what he needed all the extra money for. Often it’s because of an overspend on birds, booze or matters of the turf.
Having often been driven to pauperism by the first two, myself, I could perhaps have sympathised with that scenario. But it appears that isn’t the case here. And whilst I’ve never seen the attraction of throwing your money away on the gee-gees (although I do like a woman in jodhpurs), I suspect neither has DC. So with all reasonable excuses for being on the rob exhausted, we’re just left with plain greed.
So I think it’s goodnight for him and as it’s beddy-bye time for me, it’s goodnight from me.